Web Images Groups Books Scholar Blogs Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Common step-down switching regulator
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  17 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
pimpom  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 1:05 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "pimpom" <pim...@invalid.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 23:35:31 +0530
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 1:05 pm
Subject: Common step-down switching regulator
Can you please suggest one or more ICs for general use as a
step-down switching voltage regulator? This is for general stock
to be used as needed for a variety of projects. There's a
plethora of such devices out there, but what I'm looking for is a
type that has become popular enough to be regarded almost as an
industry standard and be available anywhere (and at a low price),
in much the same way as the linear 78xx series and the LM317.
Desireable specs would be -

1. Low external component count
2. Max input voltage around 40V
3. Max load current 1A or more
4. Fixed or adjustable output voltage
5. Output voltage range 5-15V or wider
6. Non-SMD if possible, but not essential


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mpm  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 1:09 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: mpm <mpmill...@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:09:10 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 1:09 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator
On Nov 6, 1:05 pm, "pimpom" <pim...@invalid.com> wrote:

> Can you please suggest one or more ICs for general use as a
> step-down switching voltage regulator? This is for general stock
> to be used as needed for a variety of projects. There's a
> plethora of such devices out there, but what I'm looking for is a
> type that has become popular enough to be regarded almost as an
> industry standard and be available anywhere (and at a low price),
> in much the same way as the linear 78xx series and the LM317.
> Desireable specs would be -

> 1. Low external component count
> 2. Max input voltage around 40V
> 3. Max load current 1A or more
> 4. Fixed or adjustable output voltage
> 5. Output voltage range 5-15V or wider
> 6. Non-SMD if possible, but not essential

I like the National Semi LM2575T series (TO-220 package).
Easy to use, comes in fixed and adjustable varieties, readily
available.
Low frequency switcher.

But there may be better choices out there


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
petrus bitbyter  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 1:34 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "petrus bitbyter" <pieterkraltlaatdit...@enditookhccnet.nl>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:34:54 +0100
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 1:34 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator

"pimpom" <pim...@invalid.com> schreef in bericht
news:hd1ohb$l0r$1@news.albasani.net...

> Can you please suggest one or more ICs for general use as a step-down
> switching voltage regulator? This is for general stock to be used as
> needed for a variety of projects. There's a plethora of such devices out
> there, but what I'm looking for is a type that has become popular enough
> to be regarded almost as an industry standard and be available anywhere
> (and at a low price), in much the same way as the linear 78xx series and
> the LM317. Desireable specs would be -

> 1. Low external component count
> 2. Max input voltage around 40V
> 3. Max load current 1A or more
> 4. Fixed or adjustable output voltage
> 5. Output voltage range 5-15V or wider
> 6. Non-SMD if possible, but not essential

Last time I needed such a thing I found the MC34063. Looks like to fit your
requirements pretty well.

petrus bitbyter


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Devereux  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 2:05 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: John Devereux <j...@devereux.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:05:28 +0000
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 2:05 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator

Most ubiquitous and ridiculously cheap MC34063A and copies, but it is
looking a bit long in the tooth. It's slow and transistor output. So you
will need larger inductors and capacitors, and dissapate more heat, than
more modern devices.

It is frustrating that there don't seem to be any newer parts anywhere
near the price.

--

John Devereux


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pimpom  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 2:06 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "pimpom" <pim...@invalid.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 00:36:00 +0530
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator

Thanks. I'd already looked at the LM25575 but the external
component count is a bit more than I'd like, though it seems to
have regulation and efficiency than the LM2575. I think I've seen
the 2575 used more than once before, but a browse of the NatSem
site didn't bring it up immediately, so it didn't come to mind
until you suggested it. Looks like it will do nicely. Thanks
again.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pimpom  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 2:07 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "pimpom" <pim...@invalid.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 00:37:38 +0530
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 2:07 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator

Thanks. I'd already saved the datasheet of the MC34063. If it's
widely available, it's a good candidate.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pimpom  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 2:27 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "pimpom" <pim...@invalid.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 00:57:46 +0530
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 2:27 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator

Thanks. By transistor output, I take it you mean bipolar. The
datasheet I have of the MC34063A is by ON Semi. It gives only a
limited amount of info about the efficiency and dissipation.
Maybe I should download one from another manufacturer.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Larkin  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 3:06 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: John Larkin <jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:06:01 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 3:06 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 23:35:31 +0530, "pimpom" <pim...@invalid.com>
wrote:

LM2672 is cute, 1 amp in an SO-8, 260 KHz.

Lately we've been using a lot of LTM8023s, which is a switcher with
internal Ls and Cs and everything. A bit expensive, but very simple
and very clean. It's sort of a BGA package.

John


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Spehro Pefhany  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 3:40 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Spehro Pefhany <speffS...@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:40:12 -0500
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 3:40 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:05:28 +0000, John Devereux

If you have that kind of requirement, there are definitely some
offshore-only parts that are probably near the price (probably lower
maximum input voltage). Try tearing apart some consumer goods. Also
some of the NS switchers have been cloned.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
who where  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 6:12 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: who where <no...@home.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:12:34 +0800
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 6:12 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:06:01 -0800, John Larkin

John (or anyone else here), have you looked at the RECOM R-78 series
"TO220-style" integrated switchers?  They won't fit a "low cost"
category of course.  I'd be very interested in comments from anyone
who has used them.  (I have eyed them off for a project in the past
but wound up laying out an MC34063 solution.)

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Raveninghorde  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 6:34 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Raveninghorde <raveninghorde@invalid>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:34:02 +0000
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 6:34 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:05:28 +0000, John Devereux

I'm using an NCP3063 which is a higher speed upgrade on a current
project. It's useful where you need buck or boost.

My unit has low power 5V buck and a 24V boost to power the sepic
circuitry as well as USB charger outputs. All bult around the NCP
3063. The MC34063 wasn't good enough on the first prototypes.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Devereux  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: John Devereux <j...@devereux.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:00:42 +0000
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 3:00 am
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator

I've used that one too and you're right. Still only 150kHz and bipolar
though. Might be a good fit for the OP.

--

John Devereux


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pimpom  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 1:30 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "pimpom" <pim...@invalid.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 00:00:40 +0530
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 1:30 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator

It's cute all right, but not as cheap as I'd like it to be.

> Lately we've been using a lot of LTM8023s, which is a switcher
> with
> internal Ls and Cs and everything. A bit expensive, but very
> simple
> and very clean. It's sort of a BGA package.

That's real neat but, as you say, way too expensive for the kind
of use I have in mind. It's certainly worth keeping in mind for
other purposes where price is not an important factor.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pimpom  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 1:59 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "pimpom" <pim...@invalid.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 00:29:07 +0530
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 1:59 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator

The NCP3063 looks like a good trade-off between price and
performance, and the boost option is attracttive. Perhaps a mixed
stock of it and the MC34063 will be a good idea.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pimpom  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 2:05 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "pimpom" <pim...@invalid.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 00:35:54 +0530
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 2:05 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator

The R-78 series would be perfect (~95% efficiency, through-hole
option, no external parts except the inevitable input-output
caps) but I couldn't find indicative prices with a quick search.
I expect they'll be a bit on the high side for my purpose and
also not easily available everywhere.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pimpom  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 2:29 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: "pimpom" <pim...@invalid.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 00:59:51 +0530
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 2:29 pm
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator

Thanks for all the replies, everyone. They were all on-topic and
really helpful - something that's all too often *not* the case on
Usenet.

I particularly appreciate your keeping in mind the criteria of
low cost and easy availability. The latter is necessitated by my
location and work environment (I won't bore you with the details)
which is why I didn't just make a selection from the results of
my own searches. I hope you won't mind if I ask the same type of
questions about other devices from time to time.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
who where  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 8:03 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: who where <no...@home.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:03:00 +0800
Subject: Re: Common step-down switching regulator
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 00:35:54 +0530, "pimpom" <pim...@invalid.com>
wrote:

The price I obtained here in Oz for the 5V 1A beast was ~$A13 in
singles.  As pcb real estate was available I went 34063, which gave a
cheaper result.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google