Web Images Groups Books Scholar Blogs Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Interesting email I got this morning
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 26 - 32 of 32 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older 
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
sf  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 1:18 pm
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From: sf <s...@geemail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:18:06 -0800
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 1:18 pm
Subject: Re: Interesting email I got this morning

On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:08:47 -0600, Stu <reci...@foodforu.ca> wrote:
>No. I have an oversized oven, it allows me to stack two commercial baking
>sheets in at one time.

You need to specify half or full.  I have commercial sheets too, but
they are half sheets.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "REC for Phred Re: Interesting email I got this morning" by Omelet
Omelet  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 6:08 pm
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From: Omelet <ompome...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:08:52 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 6:08 pm
Subject: Re: REC for Phred Re: Interesting email I got this morning
In article <i3ebf5l5fpn1ck8nsjc787ls3qr9bu5...@4ax.com>,

 Stu <reci...@foodforu.ca> wrote:
> Ingredients

> 1/2 cup (1 stick) butter, softened
> 1 cup light brown sugar
> 3 tablespoons granulated sugar
> 1 large egg
> 2 teaspoons vanilla extract
> 1-3/4 cups all purpose flour
> 1/2 teaspoon baking powder
> 1/2 teaspoon baking soda
> 1/2 teaspoon salt
> 1-1/2 teaspoons instant espresso coffee powder
> 1-1/2 cups semi-sweet chocolate chips

Gods that sounds good!  I saved that.
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down."  
--Steve Rothstein

Web Albums: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet>
recfoodreci...@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: recfoodrecipes-subscr...@yahoogroups.com


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bob Muncie  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:23 pm
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From: Bob Muncie <bob.mun...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:23:54 -0500
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:23 pm
Subject: Re: REC for Phred Re: Interesting email I got this morning

With that much butter and sugar, it *has* to be good ;-)

Bob


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Neiman Marcus Cookies [Was: Interesting email I got this morning]" by Phred
Phred  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 11:37 pm
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From: ppnerkDELETET...@yahoo.com (Phred)
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:37:58 GMT
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 11:37 pm
Subject: Neiman Marcus Cookies [Was: Interesting email I got this morning]

In article <XJgJm.11197$X01.8...@newsfe07.iad>, "Cheryl" <jlhsha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>"Phred" <ppnerkDELETET...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
[snip]
>> But that's the least of my problems -- we had a power glitch in the
>> midst of all this and I lost that recipe and it seems the contribution
>> was marked not to archive, so I can't get it back.  :-(

>> You don't happen to have a copy you could post, do you? TIA.

G'day Cheryl,

Thanks very much for that quick response! And for the recipe. :-)

As a matter of interest, I went looking for the "real" NM recipe when
I discovered I'd lost the version posted here.  I've appended a copy
of the recipe I found at the Neiman Marcus web site.  You will see
that it has a few differences, mainly in that flour/oatmeal component,
but also in sugar and in those small "additives".  The NM version
makes only two dozen cookies, i.e. a bit less than a quarter of the
yield of your version, but it uses as much as half the quantity of
some ingredients, and there are some variations of ingredients too.

The "Real" Neiman Marcus Cookies
Stolen from:
<http://www.neimanmarcus.com/store/service/nm_cookie_recipe.jhtml>

Ingredients
1/2 cup (1 stick) butter, softened
1 cup light brown sugar
3 tablespoons granulated sugar
1 large egg
2 teaspoons vanilla extract
1-3/4 cups all purpose flour
1/2 teaspoon baking powder
1/2 teaspoon baking soda
1/2 teaspoon salt
1-1/2 teaspoons instant espresso coffee powder
1-1/2 cups semi-sweet chocolate chips

Directions
1. Preheat oven to 300 degrees. Cream the butter with the sugars using
an electric mixer on medium speed until fluffy (approximately 30
seconds)    
2. Beat in the egg and the vanilla extract for another 30 seconds.  
3. In a mixing bowl, sift together the dry ingredients and beat into
the butter mixture at low speed for about 15 seconds. Stir in the
espresso coffee powder and chocolate chips.  
4. Using a 1 ounce scoop or a 2 tablespoon measure, drop cookie dough
onto a greased cookie sheet about 3 inches apart. Gently press down on
the dough with the back of a spoon to spread out into a 2 inch circle.
Bake for about 20 minutes or until nicely browned around the edges.
Bake a little longer for a crispier cookie. Yield: 2 dozen cookies

Cheers, Phred.

--
ppnerkDEL...@THISyahoo.com.INVALID


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "REC for Phred Re: Interesting email I got this morning" by Phred
Phred  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 12:22 am
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From: ppnerkDELETET...@yahoo.com (Phred)
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:22:32 GMT
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 12:22 am
Subject: Re: REC for Phred Re: Interesting email I got this morning

G'day Stu,

Thanks for your response and the recipe below. As I mentioned
elsewhere in reply to Cheryl, I found this one last night too (on the
Neiman Marcus web site).

Cheryl was able to supply a copy of the recipe that was originally in
this thread (in its former incarnation).  It is quoted in my reply to
her, along with a copy of this "real" NM cookie recipe so people can
have a squiz at the differences between the two.

Cheers, Phred.

--
ppnerkDEL...@THISyahoo.com.INVALID


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Neiman Marcus Cookies [Was: Interesting email I got this morning]" by PeterL
PeterL  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 1:22 am
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From: PeterL <P...@brissie.aus>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:22:58 GMT
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 1:22 am
Subject: Re: Neiman Marcus Cookies [Was: Interesting email I got this morning]
ppnerkDELETET...@yahoo.com (Phred) wrote in
news:7ln067F3e3b28U1@mid.individual.net:

112 biscuits sounds ok to me :-)

--
Peter Lucas                            
Brisbane                                
Australia      

If we are not meant to eat animals,
why are they made of meat?


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "REC for Phred Re: Interesting email I got this morning" by Stu
Stu  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 9:56 am
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
From: Stu <reci...@foodforu.ca>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:56:43 -0600
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 9:56 am
Subject: Re: REC for Phred Re: Interesting email I got this morning

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:22:32 GMT, ppnerkDELETET...@yahoo.com (Phred) wrote:

-->In article <i3ebf5l5fpn1ck8nsjc787ls3qr9bu5...@4ax.com>, Stu
<reci...@foodforu.ca> wrote:

-->>On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:49:19 GMT, ppnerkDELETET...@yahoo.com (Phred) wrote:
-->>-->In article <nEfJm.10503$6c2.5...@newsfe03.iad>, "Cheryl"
-->><jlhsha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
-->>-->>"Phred" <ppnerkDELETET...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

-->>-->>news:7lkrctF3dr5t2U1@mid.individual.net...
-->>-->>> In article <Xg0Jm.14444$Wf2.6...@newsfe23.iad>, "Cheryl"
-->>-->>> <jlhsha...@hotmail.com> wrote:

-->[snip]
-->>-->>>>I made this exact recipe once, and they were delicious.
-->>-->>>
-->>-->>> How did you fit 112 cookies on a baking sheet two inches apart?
-->>-->>
-->>-->>Huh?
-->>-->
-->>-->The recipe quoted in this thread said that it would produce 112
-->>-->cookies.  And you said you used the "exact recipe". ;-)
-->>-->
-->>-->But that's the least of my problems -- we had a power glitch in the
-->>-->midst of all this and I lost that recipe and it seems the contribution
-->>-->was marked not to archive, so I can't get it back.  :-(
-->>-->
-->>-->You don't happen to have a copy you could post, do you? TIA.
-->
-->G'day Stu,
-->
-->Thanks for your response and the recipe below. As I mentioned
-->elsewhere in reply to Cheryl, I found this one last night too (on the
-->Neiman Marcus web site).

It looks like someone doctored the other one to their specs, I've used the
original for a few years now, it's yummy  ;)


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages < Older 
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google