Message from discussion The health hazards of fluoride (long)

Path: gmdzi!unido!mcsun!sunic!uupsi!rpi!clarkson!news.clarkson.edu!nelson
From: nel...@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson)
Newsgroups: misc.kids,sci.skeptic
Subject: Re: The health hazards of fluoride (long)
Message-ID: <NELSON.90Oct7055419@image.clarkson.edu>
Date: 7 Oct 90 04:54:19 GMT
References: <4d00edb3.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM>
	<callahan.654204849@newton.cs.jhu.edu> <102@dalek.UUCP>
Sender: n...@news.clarkson.edu
Reply-To: nel...@clutx.clarkson.edu (aka NEL...@CLUTX.BITNET)
Organization: Clarkson University, Potsdam NY
Lines: 12
Posted: Sun Oct  7 05:54:19 1990
In-Reply-To: sjb@dalek.UUCP's message of 25 Sep 90 16:40:32 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: image.soe.clarkson.edu

In article <1...@dalek.UUCP> s...@dalek.UUCP (Seth J. Bradley) writes:

   One response to the anti-fluoridation people I've never seen refuted:

   1. "Natural" water sources, such as uncontaminated mountain streams,
   have substantial fluoride levels.

If it has substantial fluoride levels, then it's not uncontaminated, is it?

--
--russ (nelson@clutx [.bitnet | .clarkson.edu])  Russ.Nelson@$315.268.6667
It's better to get mugged than to live a life of fear -- Freeman Dyson