|
|
misc.kids |
In article <1...@dalek.UUCP> s...@dalek.UUCP (Seth J. Bradley) writes: >1. "Natural" water sources, such as uncontaminated mountain streams, >2. Water processing plants remove most of the naturally ocurring >3. Fluoridation is simply a means of replacing lost fluoride. Treatment >Any takers? The key questions are whether 1-4 ppm fluoride provides a significant health -- David Lubkin
>One response to the anti-fluoridation people I've never seen refuted: Irrelevant. The fact that something is "natural" has nothing to do with whether
>have substantial fluoride levels.
>fuoride as part of the purification process.
>plants routinely add back lost minerals and no one objects to that
>practice.
it is safe or not. "Natural" building materials may be high in radon.
benefit and whether it provides a significant health risk.
lub...@apollo.hp.com