|
|
misc.kids |
In article <1...@dalek.UUCP> s...@dalek.UUCP (Seth J. Bradley) writes: You compare natural products with their poisonous industrial counterparts --Philippe :-)
>One response to the anti-fluoridation people I've never seen refuted: [though it's easy. Witness... :-]
>1. "Natural" water sources, such as uncontaminated mountain streams, This one is NATURAL fluoride. It is good for your health.
>have substantial fluoride levels.
>2. Water processing plants remove most of the naturally ocurring Thus destroying much of the beneficial properties of NATURAL water.
>fuoride as part of the purification process.
>3. Fluoridation is simply a means of replacing lost fluoride. Treatment They add ARTIFICIAL, cancer-giving, chemicals. As is well-known.
>plants routinely add back lost minerals and no one objects to that
>practice.
as if they were the same. You can't fool us with your rhetorical tricks.
You really deserve to be drowned in ARTIFICIAL water.