Message from discussion
The health hazards of fluoride (long)
Path: gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!decwrl!orc!inews!iwarp.intel.com!dalek!sjb
From: s...@dalek.UUCP (Seth J. Bradley)
Newsgroups: misc.kids,sci.skeptic
Subject: Re: The health hazards of fluoride (long)
Message-ID: <102@dalek.UUCP>
Date: 25 Sep 90 16:40:32 GMT
References: <4d00edb3.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM> <callahan.654204849@newton.cs.jhu.edu>
Reply-To: s...@dalek.UUCP (Seth J. Bradley)
Organization: Bradley Marketing, Aloha, OR
Lines: 15
Posted: Tue Sep 25 17:40:32 1990
One response to the anti-fluoridation people I've never seen refuted:
1. "Natural" water sources, such as uncontaminated mountain streams,
have substantial fluoride levels.
2. Water processing plants remove most of the naturally ocurring
fuoride as part of the purification process.
3. Fluoridation is simply a means of replacing lost fluoride. Treatment
plants routinely add back lost minerals and no one objects to that
practice.
Any takers?
--
Seth J. Bradley Path: {uunet}!iwarp.intel.com!dalek!sjb