Web Images Groups Books Scholar Blogs Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
misc.kids
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion The health hazards of fluoride (long)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Seth J. Bradley  
View profile  
 More options Sep 25 1990, 10:04 pm
Newsgroups: misc.kids, sci.skeptic
From: s...@dalek.UUCP (Seth J. Bradley)
Date: 25 Sep 90 16:40:32 GMT
Local: Tues, Sep 25 1990 11:40 am
Subject: Re: The health hazards of fluoride (long)
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
One response to the anti-fluoridation people I've never seen refuted:

1. "Natural" water sources, such as uncontaminated mountain streams,
have substantial fluoride levels.

2. Water processing plants remove most of the naturally ocurring
fuoride as part of the purification process.

3. Fluoridation is simply a means of replacing lost fluoride.  Treatment
plants routinely add back lost minerals and no one objects to that
practice.

Any takers?
--
Seth J. Bradley   Path: {uunet}!iwarp.intel.com!dalek!sjb


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google