Newsgroups: misc.kids, sci.skeptic
From: asylv...@felix.UUCP (Alvin E. Sylvain)
Date: 5 Oct 90 20:39:33 GMT
Local: Fri, Oct 5 1990 3:39 pm
Subject: Re: The health hazards of fluoride
In article <6...@lifia.imag.fr> p...@lifia.UUCP (Philippe Schnoebelen) writes: I'm sorry, but somebone's going to have to explain to me the difference >In article <1...@dalek.UUCP> s...@dalek.UUCP (Seth J. Bradley) writes: >>One response to the anti-fluoridation people I've never seen refuted: >[though it's easy. Witness... :-] >>1. "Natural" water sources, such as uncontaminated mountain streams, >This one is NATURAL fluoride. It is good for your health. >>2. Water processing plants remove most of the naturally ocurring >You compare natural products with their poisonous industrial counterparts >--Philippe :-) between a NATURAL chemical and an ARTIFICIAL chemical. It reminds me of all the crap one hears about SEA SALT (For the un-initiated, NaCl stands for Sodium-Chloride, the chemical Then there's esoteric, expensive Vitamin C from ROSE HIPS (ascorbic acid) (Well, gee, I must admit, "rose hips" sure does sound better! Oh, while we're at it, let's not forget how we can be drowned in Unless you can tell me this difference, the argument of whether the A chemical is a chemical. It's "quantity of naturalness" as measured You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||