In article <152...@felix.UUCP> asylv...@felix.UUCP (Alvin E. Sylvain) writes:
>I'm sorry, but somebone's going to have to explain to me the difference >between a NATURAL chemical and an ARTIFICIAL chemical.
I believe that I can explain the nature of the claimed difference. Please don't attribute to me the opinion that I believe this is true; I am non-committal on the matter, except where I specifically note otherwise.
The nature of the "health-food fanatic" argument is that naturally occurring chemicals are available in a context in which they are mixed with some number of adulterants that may have nutritional or buffering effects that we may or may not know about.
>(Well, gee, I must admit, "rose hips" sure does sound better! > But, nevertheless, it's still the same identical thing.)
Here is the problem: something is never the "same identical thing" as something else. The health food argument is basically made by analogy to the situation with mother's milk. Artificially composed infant formula has been advertised as equal or superior to breast milk, in spite of the fact that it contains only a few dozen nutritionally significant substances at most, whereas mother's milk contains hundreds, including substances that are important in the proper development of immune response. "Health food fanatics" will argue that naturally occurring chemicals may contain adulterants that are similarly beneficial.
In some cases this can be refuted; in fact, in the case of sea salt, there are some adulterants that are likely to be detrimental, such as heavy metals (though they may occur only in insignificant quantities). In other cases, we may simply not know whether the naturally occurring substances contain some trace component that is nutritionally significant. A "health food fanatic" may really be fanatic, or may be arguing, more moderately, that we should eat the naturally occurring version just in case there is something important in it that we don't know about. Sometimes the processes we use to make food-production more convenient or economical have undesirable side-effects, such as introducing adulterants whose effects we do not know, or whose effects are known to be harmful. As an example, antibiotic-treated cattle are reported to bear bacteria that have developed resistance to antibiotics. If any of these bacteria happen to be human-disease agents, treating an infection caused by them may be complicated by this resistance.
>A chemical is a chemical. It's "quantity of naturalness" as measured >by some typical health-food fanatic is totally irrelevant.
True enough. On the other hand, a little prudence in selecting one's foods doesn't hurt, either.
>Actually, if I recall correctly from Margaret Visser's (sp.?) marvelous >book "Much depends on dinner", iodine in salt is put in to cut down on >absorption of moisture, so the salt cellars don't clog. That's why >whichever brand of salt it is - Morton's? - has as its slogan >"Iodized salt. When it rains, it pours"
But you can get it iodized or plain... I was under the impression the iodine is to prevent goiter (as another poster also noted...) I've bought both iodized and plain and never noticed a difference in moisture absorption. (I think the Morton's plain also has the "When it rains, it pours" slogan on the box, but am unsure about that.)
p...@actrix.co.nz (Paul Gillingwater) writes: >Some countries, such as New Zealand, have very low levels of iodine >as a trace element naturally occuring in the soil. For this reason, >we accept the addition of iodine to table salt as an important way >to boost levels to avoid ill health.
Similarly, the American middle-west. Where, since it was isolated from seafood (another major source of nutritional iodine), goiters and other thyroid problems had always been a major health problem until the introduction of iodine supplements (like iodized salt).
In article <1990Oct6.204509.17...@ariel.unm.edu> bev...@gauss.unm.edu (Mathemagician) writes: >The makers of salt at some point came to the realization on their >own or were coerced (I don't know which) that hypothyroidism is >a problem. Since many Americans use table salt frequently, they >could put it in their salt and nobody would notice any difference >in taste.
We don't use salt from the box. Oh, maybe twice a year I'll get a fit of industry and make biscuits or something that needs plain salt, but if I'm rubbing a chicken or making a marinade we want enough other flavors in it that I use soy sauce or something like that. Question is, since we use table salt much less than the norm, is my kid growing up more prone to thyroid problems than kids that eat iodized salt frequently?
Probably a *stoopid* question, sorry, but I had to ask...
-- ________________________________________________________________________ rosen...@ccm.hf.intel.com "I am a Bear of Very Little Brain, and long (503) 696-4554 words Bother me" -- Winnie-the-Pooh, 1926 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
In article <6...@donk.UUCP> robin@.UUCP (Robin 503-696-4554) writes: >In article <1990Oct6.204509.17...@ariel.unm.edu> bev...@gauss.unm.edu (Mathemagician) writes: >>The makers of salt at some point came to the realization on their >>own or were coerced (I don't know which) that hypothyroidism is >>a problem. Since many Americans use table salt frequently, they >>could put it in their salt and nobody would notice any difference >>in taste.
>We don't use salt from the box. Oh, maybe twice a year I'll get a fit >of industry and make biscuits or something that needs plain salt, but >if I'm rubbing a chicken or making a marinade we want enough other >flavors in it that I use soy sauce or something like that. Question >is, since we use table salt much less than the norm, is my kid growing >up more prone to thyroid problems than kids that eat iodized salt >frequently?
>Probably a *stoopid* question, sorry, but I had to ask...
Actually, quite a good one. If you're near a coast or have seafood with a bit of regularity, not to worry. I grew up in Wyoming some *mumble* years ago, when things still came in by railroad, and for us, iodine was a concern. However, salt and ITS dangers should be more of one, probably. Ask your pediatrician, but you're almost certainly fine.
>-- >________________________________________________________________________ >rosen...@ccm.hf.intel.com "I am a Bear of Very Little Brain, and long >(503) 696-4554 words Bother me" -- Winnie-the-Pooh, 1926 >------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- --Jan Yarnot-- "Never set the cat on fire, You only will annoy it."
hmm...if i live on a coast & have seafood properly, i don't have a problem...that could be problematic. i live in maine, whihc is pretty coastal, but we never eat seafood, as we are gradually becoming more & more vegetarian. so what do we need to replace the missing iodine. i do not cook woth salt, even in things like biscuits (which do not need salt to rise by the way and salt in yeast breads only inhibits rising). we do have soy sauce fairly often tho. what else is edible (no dulce or anything else revolting) and provides iodine?
In article <6...@donk.UUCP> ro...@donk.UUCP (4554) writes: > Question > is, since we use table salt much less than the norm, is my kid growing > up more prone to thyroid problems than kids that eat iodized salt > frequently?
If you're wealthy enough to have access to a computer, your kids probably get a varied enough diet, especially if you eat ocean fish every once in a while. It's the people who subsist on corn meal, okra, and peanut oil and live hundreds of miles from the coast whom iodized salt helps.
Eric Pepke INTERNET: pe...@gw.scri.fsu.edu Supercomputer Computations Research Institute MFENET: pepke@fsu Florida State University SPAN: scri::pepke Tallahassee, FL 32306-4052 BITNET: pepke@fsu
Disclaimer: My employers seldom even LISTEN to my opinions. Meta-disclaimer: Any society that needs disclaimers has too many lawyers.
In article <6...@donk.UUCP> robin@.UUCP (Robin 503-696-4554) writes: > Question >is, since we use table salt much less than the norm, is my kid growing >up more prone to thyroid problems than kids that eat iodized salt >frequently? >Probably a *stoopid* question, sorry, but I had to ask...
There are no stupid questions...the answers....well....
Chances are that your kid won't suffer hypothyroidism if he eats anything that you don't specifically make without iodide. That is, it's in cheese, soy sauce (as you mentioned), so many things it's hard to think of any. Most of the food that you buy at the local supermarket that has any salt in it probably has iodized salt (such as in soup, bread, sauce, pickled anything, etc.)
And depending on where stuff was grown, the fruits and vegetables will have enough.
The USRDA of iodine is small: 150 mcg.
-- Brian Evans |"Momma told me to never kiss a girl on the first bevans at gauss.unm.edu | date...But that's OK...I don't kiss girls."
In article <6...@donk.UUCP>, ro...@donk.UUCP (4554) writes: > We don't use salt from the box. Oh, maybe twice a year I'll get a fit > of industry and make biscuits or something that needs plain salt, but > if I'm rubbing a chicken or making a marinade we want enough other > flavors in it that I use soy sauce or something like that. Question > is, since we use table salt much less than the norm, is my kid growing > up more prone to thyroid problems than kids that eat iodized salt > frequently?
first off--I suggest you read the label on your soy sauce. As for the real question here . . . Iodine is a necessary nutrient. Seafood is the commonest source of it. If you're eating a reasonable amount of seafood, you're probably getting enough iodine in your normal diet. In the immortal words of all advice columnists--Check With Your Doctor.
> Probably a *stoopid* question, sorry, but I had to ask...
On the contrary--it's a very *smart* question. Your avoidance of salt is probably due to concern over the heavy use of salt in the American diet and you're trying to cut down. Now you find out that that's not all you get from it and you want to know if what you're missing is important. Well--it *is* important, but there are other ways to get dietary iodine.
--Hal
======================================================================= Hal Heydt | Practice Safe Government Analyst, Pacific*Bell | Use Kingdoms 415-823-5447 | (seen on a bumper sticker) w...@pbhya.PacBell.COM |
In article <1990Oct9.063154.22...@actrix.co.nz> p...@actrix.co.nz (Paul Gillingwater) writes: >In article <1990Oct7.225131.26...@nntp-server.caltech.edu> h...@deimos.caltech.edu writes: >> Actually, if I recall correctly from Margaret Visser's (sp.?) marvelous >> book "Much depends on dinner", iodine in salt is put in to cut down on >> absorption of moisture, so the salt cellars don't clog. That's why >> whichever brand of salt it is - Morton's? - has as its slogan >> "Iodized salt. When it rains, it pours"
>Some countries, such as New Zealand, have very low levels of iodine >as a trace element naturally occuring in the soil. For this reason, >we accept the addition of iodine to table salt as an important way >to boost levels to avoid ill health. >-- >Paul Gillingwater, p...@actrix.co.nz
The reason for iodized salt is, as Paul Gillingwater says, to provide an important nutrient that is normally not available in adequate quantity to those who do not eat seafood. Iodine is naturally present in most (all?) seafood so, if you eat fish you don't need iodized salt.
Iodine is also present in the soil of those areas downwind of nuclear accidents (along with naturally occurring iodine), and is readily metabolized by plants, eaten by cows, and provided in a nice, concentrated form in milk, for those who like thyroid cancers :-(
Non-iodized salt is also available from Morton's, and it is the addition of a small amount of silica to the salt that prevents it from clumping in high humidity. For example, notice that most (all?) popcorn salt, which is very fine, is not iodized and doesn't clump, either.
In article <2...@polari.UUCP>, la...@polari.UUCP (Michael Lampi) writes: > In article <1990Oct9.063154.22...@actrix.co.nz> p...@actrix.co.nz (Paul Gillingwater) writes: > >In article <1990Oct7.225131.26...@nntp-server.caltech.edu> h...@deimos.caltech.edu writes: > >> Actually, if I recall correctly from Margaret Visser's (sp.?) marvelous > >> book "Much depends on dinner", iodine in salt is put in to cut down on > >> absorption of moisture, so the salt cellars don't clog. That's why > >> whichever brand of salt it is - Morton's? - has as its slogan > >> "Iodized salt. When it rains, it pours"
The iodine is added as a dietary supplement. The anti clumping agent is often aluminum<mumble>. Read the fine print on the salt package.
> >Some countries, such as New Zealand, have very low levels of iodine > >as a trace element naturally occuring in the soil. For this reason, > >we accept the addition of iodine to table salt as an important way > >to boost levels to avoid ill health.
> The reason for iodized salt is, as Paul Gillingwater says, to provide an > important nutrient that is normally not available in adequate quantity > to those who do not eat seafood. Iodine is naturally present in most (all?) > seafood so, if you eat fish you don't need iodized salt.
Or, if you're a vegan, a bit of seaweed will do nicely.
Most of this sort of problem is academic these days, what with the common availability of various fresh foods. If we lose out transportation net, there will be a lot very sick people for a while...
> Iodine is also present in the soil of those areas downwind of nuclear > accidents (along with naturally occurring iodine), and is readily metabolized > by plants, eaten by cows, and provided in a nice, concentrated form in > milk, for those who like thyroid cancers :-(
this is easily dealt with, if you suspect the problem, by ingesting a small amount of some iodine salt, such as potassium iodide, periodically.
What the body can't use, it dumps overboard, leaving you with a lower uptake of iodine-131.
-- ------------ The only drawback with morning is that it comes at such an inconvenient time of day. ------------
I've seen the repeated claim that sea-salt has a different composition than salt from other sources. And I've tasted sea salt, and yes, it seems to taste different. The explanation has been that sea-salt has a bunch of minerals in it that are not found in "other" salt.
But this doesn't make sense. Commercial salt is mined from salt deposits, and these deposits come from dried up seas. Wouldn't the mineral composition from these seas have been (about) the same as that of the ocean?
Do salts mined from different deposits have substantially different tastes? Is tables salt processed in a way that changes it's compostion?