Web Images Groups Books Scholar Blogs Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
The health hazards of fluoride
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 26 - 39 of 39 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older 
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mikel Evins  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 1990, 7:56 am
Newsgroups: misc.kids, sci.skeptic
From: mi...@Apple.COM (Mikel Evins)
Date: 8 Oct 90 18:03:04 GMT
Local: Mon, Oct 8 1990 1:03 pm
Subject: Re: The health hazards of fluoride
In article <152...@felix.UUCP> asylv...@felix.UUCP (Alvin E. Sylvain) writes:

>I'm sorry, but somebone's going to have to explain to me the difference
>between a NATURAL chemical and an ARTIFICIAL chemical.

I believe that I can explain the nature of the claimed difference.
Please don't attribute to me the opinion that I believe this is
true; I am non-committal on the matter, except where I specifically
note otherwise.

The nature of the "health-food fanatic" argument is that naturally
occurring chemicals are available in a context in which they are
mixed with some number of adulterants that may have nutritional or
buffering effects that we may or may not know about.

>(Well, gee, I must admit, "rose hips" sure does sound better!
> But, nevertheless, it's still the same identical thing.)

Here is the problem: something is never the "same identical thing"
as something else. The health food argument is basically made
by analogy to the situation with mother's milk. Artificially composed
infant formula has been advertised as equal or superior to breast
milk, in spite of the fact that it contains only a few dozen
nutritionally significant substances at most, whereas mother's
milk contains hundreds, including substances that are important
in the proper development of immune response. "Health food fanatics"
will argue that naturally occurring chemicals may contain adulterants
that are similarly beneficial.

In some cases this can be refuted; in fact, in the case of sea salt,
there are some adulterants that are likely to be detrimental, such
as heavy metals (though they may occur only in insignificant
quantities). In other cases, we may simply not know whether the
naturally occurring substances contain some trace component that
is nutritionally significant. A "health food fanatic" may really
be fanatic, or may be arguing, more moderately, that we should
eat the naturally occurring version just in case there is something
important in it that we don't know about. Sometimes the processes
we use to make food-production more convenient or economical have
undesirable side-effects, such as introducing adulterants whose
effects we do not know, or whose effects are known to be harmful.
As an example, antibiotic-treated cattle are reported to bear bacteria
that have developed resistance to antibiotics. If any
of these bacteria happen to be human-disease agents, treating an infection
caused by them may be complicated by this resistance.

>A chemical is a chemical.  It's "quantity of naturalness" as measured
>by some typical health-food fanatic is totally irrelevant.

True enough. On the other hand, a little prudence in selecting one's
foods doesn't hurt, either.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Salt (was Re: The health hazards of fluoride)" by Mathemagician
Mathemagician  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 1990, 3:45 pm
Newsgroups: misc.kids, sci.skeptic
From: bev...@gauss.unm.edu (Mathemagician)
Date: 8 Oct 90 21:14:49 GMT
Local: Mon, Oct 8 1990 4:14 pm
Subject: Re: Salt (was Re: The health hazards of fluoride)
In article <1990Oct8.192338.25...@ariel.unm.edu> I write:

>The free flowing-ness of the salt is due to sodium silicoaluminate.

This is for the container of salt.  For popcorn salt, they add
tricalcium phosphate.

--
Brian Evans             |"Momma told me to never kiss a girl on the first
bevans at gauss.unm.edu | date...But that's OK...I don't kiss girls."


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "The health hazards of fluoride (long)" by Tom Bruhns
Tom Bruhns  
View profile  
 More options Oct 11 1990, 12:25 pm
Newsgroups: misc.kids
From: t...@hplsla.HP.COM (Tom Bruhns)
Date: 11 Oct 90 17:25:24 GMT
Local: Thurs, Oct 11 1990 12:25 pm
Subject: Re: The health hazards of fluoride (long)
h...@deimos.caltech.edu (Helen Johnston) writes:

...

>Actually, if I recall correctly from Margaret Visser's (sp.?) marvelous
>book "Much depends on dinner", iodine in salt is put in to cut down on
>absorption of moisture, so the salt cellars don't clog. That's why
>whichever brand of salt it is - Morton's? - has as its slogan
>"Iodized salt. When it rains, it pours"

But you can get it iodized or plain...  I was under the impression the
iodine is to prevent goiter (as another poster also noted...)  I've
bought both iodized and plain and never noticed a difference in moisture
absorption.  (I think the Morton's plain also has the "When it rains,
it pours" slogan on the box, but am unsure about that.)

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Iodine in table salt" by Nichael Cramer
Nichael Cramer  
View profile  
 More options Oct 12 1990, 2:23 pm
Newsgroups: misc.kids, sci.skeptic
Followup-To: misc.kids
From: ncra...@bbn.com (Nichael Cramer)
Date: 12 Oct 90 19:23:13 GMT
Local: Fri, Oct 12 1990 2:23 pm
Subject: Re: Iodine in table salt

p...@actrix.co.nz (Paul Gillingwater) writes:
>Some countries, such as New Zealand, have very low levels of iodine
>as a trace element naturally occuring in the soil.  For this reason,
>we accept the addition of iodine to table salt as an important way
>to boost levels to avoid ill health.

Similarly, the American middle-west.  Where, since it was isolated from
seafood (another major source of nutritional iodine), goiters and other
thyroid problems had always been a major health problem until the
introduction of iodine supplements (like iodized salt).

N


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Bimbo iodized salt question (was health hazards of fluoride)" by 4554
4554  
View profile  
 More options Oct 12 1990, 5:51 pm
Newsgroups: misc.kids, sci.skeptic
From: ro...@donk.UUCP (4554)
Date: 12 Oct 90 22:51:10 GMT
Local: Fri, Oct 12 1990 5:51 pm
Subject: Bimbo iodized salt question (was health hazards of fluoride)

In article <1990Oct6.204509.17...@ariel.unm.edu> bev...@gauss.unm.edu (Mathemagician) writes:
>The makers of salt at some point came to the realization on their
>own or were coerced (I don't know which) that hypothyroidism is
>a problem.  Since many Americans use table salt frequently, they
>could put it in their salt and nobody would notice any difference
>in taste.

We don't use salt from the box.  Oh, maybe twice a year I'll get a fit
of industry and make biscuits or something that needs plain salt, but
if I'm rubbing a chicken or making a marinade we want enough other
flavors in it that I use soy sauce or something like that.  Question
is, since we use table salt much less than the norm, is my kid growing
up more prone to thyroid problems than kids that eat iodized salt
frequently?

Probably a *stoopid* question, sorry, but I had to ask...

--
________________________________________________________________________
rosen...@ccm.hf.intel.com    "I am a Bear of Very Little Brain, and long
(503) 696-4554                words Bother me"  -- Winnie-the-Pooh, 1926
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jan Yarnot  
View profile  
 More options Oct 13 1990, 10:21 am
Newsgroups: misc.kids
From: yar...@csusac.csus.edu (Jan Yarnot)
Date: 13 Oct 90 15:21:38 GMT
Local: Sat, Oct 13 1990 10:21 am
Subject: Re: Bimbo iodized salt question (was health hazards of fluoride)

Actually, quite a good one.  If you're near a coast or have seafood with a
bit of regularity, not to worry.  I grew up in Wyoming some *mumble* years
ago, when things still came in by railroad, and for us, iodine was a concern.
However, salt and ITS dangers should be more of one, probably.  Ask your
pediatrician, but you're almost certainly fine.

>--
>________________________________________________________________________
>rosen...@ccm.hf.intel.com    "I am a Bear of Very Little Brain, and long
>(503) 696-4554                words Bother me"  -- Winnie-the-Pooh, 1926
>------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
--Jan Yarnot--                  "Never set the cat on fire,
                                 You only will annoy it."

CSUS depends on my every word.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ailsa N.T. Murphy  
View profile  
 More options Oct 14 1990, 8:42 pm
Newsgroups: misc.kids
From: IO81...@MAINE.BITNET (Ailsa N.T. Murphy)
Date: 15 Oct 90 01:42:29 GMT
Local: Sun, Oct 14 1990 8:42 pm
Subject: Re: Bimbo iodized salt question (was health hazards of fluoride)
hmm...if i live on a coast & have seafood properly, i don't have a
problem...that could be problematic.  i live in maine, whihc is
pretty coastal, but we never eat seafood, as we are gradually
becoming more & more vegetarian.  so what do we need to replace
the missing iodine.  i do not cook woth salt, even in things like
biscuits (which do not need salt to rise by the way  and salt in
yeast breads only inhibits rising).  we do have soy sauce fairly often
tho.  what else is edible (no dulce or anything else revolting) and
provides iodine?

                                        -ailsa


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eric Pepke  
View profile  
 More options Oct 15 1990, 3:41 pm
Newsgroups: misc.kids, sci.skeptic
Followup-To: misc.kids
From: pe...@gw.scri.fsu.edu (Eric Pepke)
Date: 15 Oct 90 20:41:12 GMT
Local: Mon, Oct 15 1990 3:41 pm
Subject: Re: Bimbo iodized salt question (was health hazards of fluoride)

In article <6...@donk.UUCP> ro...@donk.UUCP (4554) writes:
> Question
> is, since we use table salt much less than the norm, is my kid growing
> up more prone to thyroid problems than kids that eat iodized salt
> frequently?

If you're wealthy enough to have access to a computer, your kids probably
get a varied enough diet, especially if you eat ocean fish every once in a
while.  It's the people who subsist on corn meal, okra, and peanut oil and
live hundreds of miles from the coast whom iodized salt helps.

Eric Pepke                                    INTERNET: pe...@gw.scri.fsu.edu
Supercomputer Computations Research Institute MFENET:   pepke@fsu
Florida State University                      SPAN:     scri::pepke
Tallahassee, FL 32306-4052                    BITNET:   pepke@fsu

Disclaimer: My employers seldom even LISTEN to my opinions.
Meta-disclaimer: Any society that needs disclaimers has too many lawyers.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mathemagician  
View profile  
 More options Oct 16 1990, 12:25 am
Newsgroups: misc.kids, sci.skeptic
From: bev...@gauss.unm.edu (Mathemagician)
Date: 16 Oct 90 05:25:54 GMT
Local: Tues, Oct 16 1990 12:25 am
Subject: Re: Bimbo iodized salt question (was health hazards of fluoride)

In article <6...@donk.UUCP> robin@.UUCP (Robin 503-696-4554) writes:
>  Question
>is, since we use table salt much less than the norm, is my kid growing
>up more prone to thyroid problems than kids that eat iodized salt
>frequently?
>Probably a *stoopid* question, sorry, but I had to ask...

There are no stupid questions...the answers....well....

Chances are that your kid won't suffer hypothyroidism if he eats
anything that you don't specifically make without iodide.  That
is, it's in cheese, soy sauce (as you mentioned), so many things
it's hard to think of any.  Most of the food that you buy at the
local supermarket that has any salt in it probably has iodized
salt (such as in soup, bread, sauce, pickled anything, etc.)

And depending on where stuff was grown, the fruits and vegetables
will have enough.

The USRDA of iodine is small:  150 mcg.

--
Brian Evans             |"Momma told me to never kiss a girl on the first
bevans at gauss.unm.edu | date...But that's OK...I don't kiss girls."


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Wilson Heydt  
View profile  
 More options Oct 16 1990, 11:14 am
Newsgroups: misc.kids, sci.skeptic
Followup-To: misc.kids
From: w...@PacBell.COM (Wilson Heydt)
Date: 16 Oct 90 16:14:18 GMT
Local: Tues, Oct 16 1990 11:14 am
Subject: Re: Bimbo iodized salt question (was health hazards of fluoride)

In article <6...@donk.UUCP>, ro...@donk.UUCP (4554) writes:
> We don't use salt from the box.  Oh, maybe twice a year I'll get a fit
> of industry and make biscuits or something that needs plain salt, but
> if I'm rubbing a chicken or making a marinade we want enough other
> flavors in it that I use soy sauce or something like that.  Question
> is, since we use table salt much less than the norm, is my kid growing
> up more prone to thyroid problems than kids that eat iodized salt
> frequently?

first off--I suggest you read the label on your soy sauce.  As for the
real question here . . .  Iodine is a necessary nutrient.  Seafood is
the commonest source of it.  If you're eating a reasonable amount of
seafood, you're probably getting enough iodine in your normal diet.
In the immortal words of all advice columnists--Check With Your Doctor.

> Probably a *stoopid* question, sorry, but I had to ask...

On the contrary--it's a very *smart* question.  Your avoidance of salt
is probably due to concern over the heavy use of salt in the American
diet and you're trying to cut down.  Now you find out that that's not
all you get from it and you want to know if what you're missing is
important.  Well--it *is* important, but there are other ways to get
dietary iodine.

        --Hal

=======================================================================
Hal Heydt                    |    Practice Safe Government
Analyst, Pacific*Bell        |           Use Kingdoms
415-823-5447                 |     (seen on a bumper sticker)
w...@pbhya.PacBell.COM        |  


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Iodine in table salt" by Michael Lampi
Michael Lampi  
View profile  
 More options Oct 17 1990, 9:47 am
Newsgroups: misc.kids, sci.skeptic
From: la...@polari.UUCP (Michael Lampi)
Date: 17 Oct 90 14:47:21 GMT
Local: Wed, Oct 17 1990 9:47 am
Subject: Re: Iodine in table salt

In article <1990Oct9.063154.22...@actrix.co.nz> p...@actrix.co.nz (Paul Gillingwater) writes:
>In article <1990Oct7.225131.26...@nntp-server.caltech.edu> h...@deimos.caltech.edu writes:
>> Actually, if I recall correctly from Margaret Visser's (sp.?) marvelous
>> book "Much depends on dinner", iodine in salt is put in to cut down on
>> absorption of moisture, so the salt cellars don't clog. That's why
>> whichever brand of salt it is - Morton's? - has as its slogan
>> "Iodized salt. When it rains, it pours"

>Some countries, such as New Zealand, have very low levels of iodine
>as a trace element naturally occuring in the soil.  For this reason,
>we accept the addition of iodine to table salt as an important way
>to boost levels to avoid ill health.
>--
>Paul Gillingwater, p...@actrix.co.nz

The reason for iodized salt is, as Paul Gillingwater says, to provide an
important nutrient that is normally not available in adequate quantity
to those who do not eat seafood. Iodine is naturally present in most (all?)
seafood so, if you eat fish you don't need iodized salt.

Iodine is also present in the soil of those areas downwind of nuclear
accidents (along with naturally occurring iodine), and is readily metabolized
by plants, eaten by cows, and provided in a nice, concentrated form in
milk, for those who like thyroid cancers :-(

Non-iodized salt is also available from Morton's, and it is the addition of a
small amount of silica to the salt that prevents it from clumping in high
humidity. For example, notice that most (all?) popcorn salt, which is very
fine, is not iodized and doesn't clump, either.

Michael Lampi


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Bimbo iodized salt question (was health hazards of fluoride)" by Ron DeBlock
Ron DeBlock  
View profile  
 More options Oct 17 1990, 1:28 pm
Newsgroups: misc.kids
From: r...@mtunf.ATT.COM (Ron DeBlock)
Date: 17 Oct 90 18:28:56 GMT
Local: Wed, Oct 17 1990 1:28 pm
Subject: Re: Bimbo iodized salt question (was health hazards of fluoride)
Veggies grown in an area where there is iodine in the ground will also
have some iodine content.

--
Ron DeBlock     N2JSO                   If God had meant for Man
r...@mtunf.att.com                       to see the sun rise, He
!mtunf!rdb                              would have scheduled it
                                        later in the day.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Iodine in table salt" by Steve Hix
Steve Hix  
View profile  
 More options Oct 17 1990, 4:58 pm
Newsgroups: misc.kids
From: fidd...@concertina.Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Hix)
Date: 17 Oct 90 21:58:42 GMT
Local: Wed, Oct 17 1990 4:58 pm
Subject: Re: Iodine in table salt

In article <2...@polari.UUCP>, la...@polari.UUCP (Michael Lampi) writes:
> In article <1990Oct9.063154.22...@actrix.co.nz> p...@actrix.co.nz (Paul Gillingwater) writes:
> >In article <1990Oct7.225131.26...@nntp-server.caltech.edu> h...@deimos.caltech.edu writes:
> >> Actually, if I recall correctly from Margaret Visser's (sp.?) marvelous
> >> book "Much depends on dinner", iodine in salt is put in to cut down on
> >> absorption of moisture, so the salt cellars don't clog. That's why
> >> whichever brand of salt it is - Morton's? - has as its slogan
> >> "Iodized salt. When it rains, it pours"

The iodine is added as a dietary supplement.  The anti clumping agent
is often aluminum<mumble>.  Read the fine print on the salt package.

> >Some countries, such as New Zealand, have very low levels of iodine
> >as a trace element naturally occuring in the soil.  For this reason,
> >we accept the addition of iodine to table salt as an important way
> >to boost levels to avoid ill health.

> The reason for iodized salt is, as Paul Gillingwater says, to provide an
> important nutrient that is normally not available in adequate quantity
> to those who do not eat seafood. Iodine is naturally present in most (all?)
> seafood so, if you eat fish you don't need iodized salt.

Or, if you're a vegan, a bit of seaweed will do nicely.

Most of this sort of problem is academic these days, what with the common
availability of various fresh foods.  If we lose out transportation net,
there will be a lot very sick people for a while...

> Iodine is also present in the soil of those areas downwind of nuclear
> accidents (along with naturally occurring iodine), and is readily metabolized
> by plants, eaten by cows, and provided in a nice, concentrated form in
> milk, for those who like thyroid cancers :-(

this is easily dealt with, if you suspect the problem, by ingesting a
small amount of some iodine salt, such as potassium iodide, periodically.

What the body can't use, it dumps overboard, leaving you with a lower
uptake of iodine-131.

--
------------
  The only drawback with morning is that it comes
    at such an inconvenient time of day.
------------


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Differences in salt?" by David Throop
David Throop  
View profile  
 More options Oct 26 1990, 4:44 pm
Newsgroups: misc.kids, sci.skeptic, rec.food.cooking
Followup-To: rec.food.cooking
From: thr...@cs.utexas.edu (David Throop)
Date: 26 Oct 90 21:44:16 GMT
Local: Fri, Oct 26 1990 4:44 pm
Subject: Differences in salt?
I've seen the repeated claim that sea-salt has a different composition
than salt from other sources.  And I've tasted sea salt, and yes, it
seems to taste different.  The explanation has been that sea-salt has
a bunch of minerals in it that are not found in "other" salt.

 But this doesn't make sense.  Commercial salt is mined from salt
deposits, and these deposits come from dried up seas.  Wouldn't the
mineral composition from these seas have been (about) the same as that
of the ocean?

  Do salts mined from different deposits have substantially different
tastes?  Is tables salt processed in a way that changes it's
compostion?

David Throop


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages < Older 
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google