The standard error in astrology is two to six signs. This means that you have most probably been fooled not by one but by two natal signs. This is of course but the beginning of a mountain of errors that were corrected by zodiacal reformation.
The tropical astrologers are even more sincere than the sidereal ones since they will never claim that they work with your natal sky at all. In fact, they have no idea of your true natal sky, much as they have no idea of their own.
The sidereal astrologers will on the other hand claim that they represent the stars which they do not, since they distort your natal skies more or less like tropical astrologers do.
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:34:41 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Academic Zodiac 22 Zodiacal Constellations 16 Eastern Ascednants <wirel...@gmail.com>:
>The standard error in astrology is two to six signs.
The standard error in astrology is imagining that it's more than a game, and that it has any relevance to reality.
> This means that >you have most probably been fooled not by one but by two natal signs. >This is of course but the beginning of a mountain of errors that were >corrected by zodiacal reformation.
>The tropical astrologers are even more sincere than the sidereal ones >since they will never claim that they work with your natal sky at all. >In fact, they have no idea of your true natal sky, much as they have >no idea of their own.
>The sidereal astrologers will on the other hand claim that they >represent the stars which they do not, since they distort your natal >skies more or less like tropical astrologers do.
|
